Why is it always so bleak?

Sorry for the lateness of this post ya’ll, had some issues to deal with!


It seems that I find myself reading things this week (both for this class and for my field exam) that are quite damning of our current situation— it’s like listening to one of my old brown Middle Eastern or South Asian uncles lament the issues of “this generation” (which is usually not-so-subtle code to blast progressive views on social issues— or at least espouse conservative social values, no matter how nonsensical they might be when looking at you know, the history of the world).  Or it’s like listening to various public figures talk smack about millennials and the problems of millennial culture.

“It is information itself which produces uncertainty, and so this uncertainty, unlike the traditional one which could always be resolved, is irreparable.”  (580)


Now obviously, Baudrillard (and Benjamin, who I was also reading this past week) are a bit more sophisticated than my racist and homophobic uncles. The damning portrait they paint of technological reproduction and of media and the information age are done with an extensive philosophical understanding of how art, of how society, and of how the masses function and exist in our world.

“Overinformed, it develops in-growing obesity.” (580)

But man, I know that my mind is no where near capable of their kind of thinking, but must everything be so damning?  Is this really how they view the world?  Is societal, or at least technological, progression equivalent to society losing its grasp on actual “meaning?”  Benjamin was concerned with art losing its aura and authority when copies were able to be reproduced on a mass scale through photographic means— and Baudrillard was concerned over the loss of meaning, the “liquidation” of it, the “violence done to [it].”  But again, I keep coming back to this same questions of culture and my own interests— what if aura or authority don’t matter as much?  What if meaning does not come from words and what they aren’t or are in relation to one another?  What if we think of meaning in accordance to Eastern philosophies (be they related to Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, or anything else)?  And this leads me to another question, how much exposure did these Western Europeans have to non-Western traditions and thought?  I honestly don’t know.  But it seems like none at all.  And perhaps this is too simplistic, but for that reason I read everything they write with a great amount of suspicion.

Why is it always so bleak?

One thought on “Why is it always so bleak?

  1. danbyd1 says:

    This is actually really interesting and made me think of history books made for children and teenagers. How many times haven’t we read stories about a system of government in an ancient region who falls prey to another more powerful system and so on in a continuous loop. The constant changes are portrayed as natural and “good” or cruel and “bad” depending on the book. How good or how bad can it get, in this infinite progression?
    After reading your post, I find that the same thing can be said about theorists that believe the new media brings damnation while others look at it as the solution for our problems. While many theorists, like Benjamin, may be using the new media to attempt to make a point against fascism, the result can be interpretations like the one you have here. And, curiously enough, after reading Benjamin and agreeing with his words, I find myself agreeing with you too.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s